• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (4)
  •  

Fishermen fear corporate takeovers looming

Ashton Spinney

Ashton Spinney

Greg Bennett
Published on March 12, 2012
Published on March 12, 2012
Greg Bennett  RSS Feed

Alarm raised over Fisheries and Oceans discussion paper

 

 

 

By Greg Bennett

Fisheries groups across Atlantic Canada and beyond are raising the alarm over a Fisheries and Oceans discussion paper on the future management of the industry.

A coalition of groups claiming to represent 30,000 fishermen has submitted a strongly worded response largely aimed at keeping the separation between independent and corporate-controlled fisheries.

Lobster Fisheries Advisory Board 34 Chair Ashton Spinney says communities that depend on independent fisheries like the inshore lobster fishery have reason to be concerned about the possibility of losing owner-operator policies.

“There would no longer be an inshore fishery as we know it,” said Spinney. “It would be all bought up by companies.”

In a joint statement, the coalition of fisheries groups described the Fisheries and Oceans initiative as “A barely veiled attack on the policies that protect self-employed, independent fishermen.”

The statement notes that the inshore and mid-shore owner-operator fleets in Atlantic Canada land more than 75% of the value of Atlantic fisheries through their control of lobster and crab fishing and their majority share of the shrimp fishery. Under government policies in place since the early 1980s licences to these fisheries are restricted to individual fishermen who must own and operate their own vessels. The statement further notes that fish companies have been trying to gain access to these licences for years.

“It affects not only us …but future generations,” said Spinney. “We want this protected.”

Federal Fisheries Minister Keith Ashfield issued a statement last week about the need for change in fisheries management.

“Canada has the longest coastline and arguably the best seafood products in the world, but we are time and again being out-performed by smaller countries with shorter coastlines and less access to the resource. During this time of economic uncertainty, we cannot afford to waste this precious resource,” wrote the minister.

The minister noted that in meetings with hundreds of Canadians and groups across the country, he hears one consistent message: “change is needed.” 

The DFO announced in January it was embarking on a discussion of changes to the Atlantic fishery and gave groups in the industry six weeks to respond. The initial Feb. 29 deadline has been extended to March 14.

As a part of its response to the discussion paper, the coalition is asking Fisheries and Ocean to entrench owner-operator and fleet separations rules into law.

“We believe that regulatory and legislative entrenchment of the Fleet Separation and Owner-Operator policies is the key public policy decision to be made regarding the Atlantic fishery; a policy decision that speaks directly to access and allocation, economic viability and conservation concerns,” reads the response.

While not defending the status-quo, the coalition’s response says the discussion paper reveals a very different understanding of what needs to be changed.

“Changing the rules and policies that govern our fisheries management to make life easier for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, especially those who are far removed from the reality of the fishery, is not what we have in mind when we say “fisheries management needs to change.”

 

 

 

Comments

  • Username
    AMAZED
    - March 18, 2012 at 20:47:01

    These licences and quotas are needed to appease people in the European Union in the deal Harper will be signing in July. Ask fishers in Scotland how well this worked for them,they stand on the wharf and watch foreigners catch thier fish and any quota they do receive is administered by the Grand Poobah in Brussels Belgium.But wait one second...where was this in thier mandate before the election?Would you have voted for them if they were up front about this and EI changes? Kinda dishonest I think.Who ever thought we would have a European Free Trade Deal?Kinda play thier cards close to the chest.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    tom russell
    - March 12, 2012 at 20:33:36

    the cohen commission has shown that the dfo is the biggest danger to salmon stocks on bc coast unless politics are removed from management dfo is a usless commodity

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Clinton Pendleton
      - March 23, 2012 at 23:52:49

      We should be using examples of what happened to the cod fishery in Newfoundland, the ground fishery in Nova Scotia, the Salmon fishery in BC and even trying to link this with what happened to the farming in all of Canada. I think we can make a case that the similarities all head in the same direction and it is time for us to start learning from history and speak out against these acts of corporate favortism. This administration has no business doing this to fishermen. Its just not the right thing to do.

  • Username
    Fed up with the Feds
    - March 12, 2012 at 16:01:01

    "The minister noted that in meetings with hundreds of Canadians and groups across the country, he hears one consistent message: “change is needed.” How easy it is to say something like this without providing documentation. What sorts of changes are being advocated? Are those who advocate the changes fishermen, Canadian corporations, governments, foreign concerns, or multinationals? Who stands to benefit from the changes? What sort of impact will the changes have on the economy, the current stakeholders, and the resource? How will the changes affect our social structure? On what grounds are the changes being advocated? Are there studies to back up proposed changes? Undocumented comments are not worth the bandwidth the feds use to push them.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

More

  • No available services
Ad Finder

May 19th 2013

View our Newspaper ads

Advertising